Family Adoption Programme: Perception and Feedback of Families- A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors

  • Vijay Sondarva Senior Resident, Dept of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar Author
  • Atulya Prasad 3rd Year MBBS student, Government Medical College Bhavnagar Author
  • Reeva Patel 3rd Year MBBS student, Government Medical College Bhavnagar Author
  • Sharan Pansuriya 3rd Year MBBS student, Government Medical College Bhavnagar Author
  • Richa Goyal 3rd Year MBBS student, Government Medical College Bhavnagar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51957/Healthline_877_2026

Keywords:

Competency Based Medical Education, Family Adoption Programme, Feedback, National Medical Commission, Perceptions

Abstract

Introduction: The Family Adoption Programme (FAP), introduced under the Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) curriculum by the National Medical Commission, provides undergraduate medical students with experiential learning in community-based healthcare through long term engagement with rural families. Assessing adopted family’s perception and feedback is essential to evaluate the programme’s effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

Methods: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted in one village among 103 families adopted under FAP by medical college. One adult respondent from each family was interviewed by house-to-house visit using semi-structured questionnaire after obtaining informed consent. The information on socio-demographic characteristics, awareness regarding FAP, perceived benefits, expectations, satisfaction and suggestions for programme improvement was collected.

Results: Medical students were the primary source of information regarding FAP for 85.4% of the respondents. Most of the families (66%) perceived FAP primarily as a means of receiving free healthcare at home and it facilitates early disease detection (86.4%). Health education, blood pressure measurement, anthropometric assessment and information on government schemes were found to be the most expected services of families. 96.1% respondents rated student’s communication skills as good and 75.7% said students were confident.90.3% families reported irregular follow-up by students. Help in healthcare assess and increasing the frequency of family visits were most frequently suggested improvements.

Conclusion: The adopted families perceived FAP as programme for providing free healthcare services at home and beneficial for early disease detection. They appreciated the medical student’s communication skills and confidence. However, most families reported irregular follow up by students.

References

1. National Medical Commission (NMC). Guidelines for implementation of new Competency Based Medical Education for Undergraduate Course Curriculum [Internet]. New Delhi: Undergraduate Medical Education Board, National Medical Commission; 2022 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/MCIRest/open/getDocument?path=/Documents/Public/Portal/LatestNews/Implementation.pdf

2. Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Science (MGIMS). Community Based Medical Education [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jul 13]. Available from: https://www.mgims.ac.in/index.php/community/community-based-medical-education

3. Shree A, Rashmi S, Sunil Kumar D. Community as a classroom: Perception of an Indian medical graduate on family adoption program. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2024 Jul;28:101630. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101630

4. Reshmi PS, Lunagariya R, Patel H, Patel N, Chauhan D, Patel R. Qualitative Study to Identify Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Challenges of Family Adoption Programs among Students. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2024 Jul;49(4):610–6. doi:10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_58_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_58_23

5. Chepuru R, Sushma KS, Vadlamani S, Manasa RV, Vennam BS. Family adoption program (FAP) as a learning tool—perceptions of students and faculty of community medicine. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 2025 Jan;14(1):51–5. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_510_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_510_24

6. Arumugam B, Sanjana L, Singh DG, Kuppuraj P, Sayee TSM. A narrative review on the experience of “Family Adoption Programme” in a tertiary care institute. JCHM. 2022 Jul 28;9(2):54–9. doi:10.18231/j.jchm.2022.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jchm.2022.012

7. Shree A, Rashmi S, Shruddha K, Nath AR, Sunil Kumar D. Lived realities of family engagement: A thematic exploration of the family adoption program. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2026 Mar;38:102305. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2026.102305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2026.102305

8. Gupta P, Sharma N, Saxena D. Fostering empathy through Experience: Assessing the outcomes of the Family Adoption Program (FAP) among indian medical graduates. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2025 Jul;34:102112. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102112

Downloads

Published

15-10-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Sondarva V, Prasad A, Patel R, Pansuriya S, Goyal R. Family Adoption Programme: Perception and Feedback of Families- A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthline. 2026;17(3):271-275. doi:10.51957/Healthline_877_2026