A Cross-Sectional Study of Input-Output Performance of Health Facilities Under LaQshya: Evidence from Western Gujarat, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51957/Healthline_789_2025Keywords:
Breast Feeding, Maternal Health Services, Health Facilities, Quality of Health CareAbstract
Introduction: The Government of India has implemented LaQshya initiative to improve quality of intrapartum and postpartum care in public health facilities through structured quality improvement initiatives. Yet, empirical evidence on how preparedness at facility level affects outcomes in maternal service delivery is lacking in majority of districts in Gujarat. Objective: To measure the association between input preparedness and output performance indicators of the labour rooms in public health facilities implementing LaQshya in Rajkot district, Gujarat. Methods: A cross-sectional study (March–June 2022) in eight LaQshya-notified government facilities of Rajkot assessed input readiness using a checklist adapted from LaQshya standards. Domains included infrastructure, equipment, drugs, and human resources, summarized as composite input scores. Output measures covered deliveries, caesarean rates, PPH, breastfeeding initiation, patient satisfaction, and referral delays. Descriptive analysis and Spearman’s rank correlation examined associations between facility readiness and maternal health service outcomes. Results: Composite input scores in facilities ranged from 56.2% to 89.5%. There were statistically significant positive correlations between input scores and early initiation of breastfeeding (ρ = 0.72, p = 0.043) and delivery volume (ρ = 0.61, p = 0.05). Facilities with higher input scores consistently performed better in critical maternal health outcomes. Facilities with low input scores had evidence of delays in the referral process, low patient satisfaction rates, and gaps in availability of supplies. Conclusion: Facilities with stronger LaQshya input showed better maternal outcomes, especially breastfeeding and delivery volume. Strengthening inputs in facilities with poor score may reduce maternal morbidity and improve patient satisfaction significantly.
References
1. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), India, 2019-20: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. Mumbai: IIPS; 2020.
2. UNICEF. Every Newborn: An Action Plan to End Preventable Deaths. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
3. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Lawn JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014;384(9940):347–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3
4. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. LaQshya – Labour Room Quality Improvement Initiative: Operational Guidelines. Government of India; 2017.
5. Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, Bhattacharyya S. Determinants of women's satisfaction with maternal health care: a review of literature from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0525-0
6. National Health Systems Resource Centre. Operational Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Public Health Facilities. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2013.
7. Sharma G, Mathur S, Singh S. Understanding Implementation Challenges of LaQshya in High Delivery Load Facilities: Insights from Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Public Health. 2021;65(2):124–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.IJPH_135_19
8. Agarwal S, Sripad P, Johnson C, Kirk K, Bellows B, Ana J, et al. A conceptual framework for measuring community health workforce performance within primary health care systems. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0422-0
9. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1988.03410120089033
10. Raj A, Dey A, Boyce S, Seth A, Bora S, Chandurkar D, et al. Associations between Quality of Facility-Based Maternity and Newborn Care and Maternal and Newborn Health Outcomes in Uttar Pradesh, India. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 6;12(10):e0184787.
11. Kruk ME, Gage AD, Arsenault C, Jordan K, Leslie HH, Roder-DeWan S, et al. High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
12. World Health Organization. Standards for improving quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
13. Sharma G, Powell-Jackson T, Haider S, Ranganathan M. Quality of routine essential care during childbirth: clinical observations of uncomplicated births in Uttar Pradesh, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jul 1;95(7):419–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.179291
14. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10056):2176–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6
15. Chou D, Daelmans B, Jolivet RR, Kinney M, Say L. Ending preventable maternal and newborn mortality and stillbirths. BMJ. 2015 Sep 14;351:h4255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4255
16. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring Evidence for Disrespect and Abuse in Facility-Based Childbirth. USAID/TRAction Project; 2010.
17. White Ribbon Alliance. Respectful Maternity Care: The Universal Rights of Childbearing Women. Washington DC: WRA; 2011.
18. Tunçalp Ӧ, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns—the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1045–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13451
19. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, Campbell J, Channon AA, Cheung NF, et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gaurav B. Shukla, Mahaveer G. Golechha , Bharti D. Koria, Mitesh N. Bhanderi, Hiral A. Raval, Apurva N. Ratnu (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles in "Healthline Journal" are Open Access articles. The license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work and source is properly cited, and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
